By Muhammad Mamman
Nigeria’s domestic intelligence agency has filed a lawsuit against former Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai, accusing him of unlawfully intercepting the private communications of the country’s National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu, in a case that has reignited debate over abuse of power and the rule of law.
In court documents seen by reporters, the Department of State Services (DSS) alleged that the former governor authorised or facilitated covert surveillance activities without judicial approval, in violation of Nigeria’s constitution and cybercrime laws.
The agency said the alleged interception occurred while El-Rufai was serving as governor of Kaduna State, describing the act as a “grave breach of national security protocols” and an infringement on the fundamental right to privacy.
According to the DSS, the lawsuit seeks a judicial declaration that the surveillance was illegal, alongside damages and an injunction barring any further interference with protected communications involving senior government officials.
El-Rufai has not yet issued a formal response to the suit, though associates of the former governor have previously dismissed similar allegations as politically motivated.
Wider implications for Nigeria
The case has drawn sharp reactions across Nigeria’s political and civil society space, with legal experts warning that it could become a landmark test of accountability for public office holders.
Rights advocates argue that the lawsuit highlights long-standing concerns about unchecked surveillance and the misuse of state power, particularly by subnational authorities. They are calling for stronger oversight of security agencies and clearer safeguards to prevent unlawful monitoring of citizens and officials alike.
Analysts also say the development underscores deeper national issues, including weak institutional checks, politicisation of security, and the urgent need for reforms to Nigeria’s intelligence and data-protection frameworks.
The matter is expected to proceed in the coming weeks, as the court determines whether the former governor has a case to answer.
