By Muhammad Mamman
A Nigerian Christian cleric, Rev Ezekiel Dachomo, has accused school authorities of denying his children admission because of his outspoken stance against attacks on Christian communities, raising fresh concerns over religious discrimination and freedom of expression in the country.
In an emotional public statement, Dachomo said he was informed that his children would not be admitted into a school he applied to on their behalf, a decision he claims is linked directly to his vocal criticism of violence targeting Christians in parts of Nigeria.
“They are punishing my children because of my stand,” the pastor said, describing the decision as unjust and harmful to his family. He did not immediately name the school involved or provide documentary evidence, but said he was prepared to pursue the matter through legal and public channels.
Nigeria, Africa’s most populous country, is sharply divided along religious lines, with a predominantly Muslim north and a largely Christian south. Recurrent violence in central and northern regions — often involving armed groups, communal clashes and criminal gangs — has repeatedly taken on religious or ethnic dimensions, fuelling deep mistrust.
Human rights advocates say denying children access to education on the basis of a parent’s beliefs or activism would amount to a serious violation of fundamental rights.
“Children should never be targeted or disadvantaged because of the views of their parents,” a rights lawyer told Al Jazeera, calling for an independent investigation into the allegations.
Education authorities have yet to publicly respond to Dachomo’s claims. It remains unclear whether the alleged denial was formally documented or communicated verbally.
The incident has sparked debate on social media, with supporters describing the pastor as a victim of intimidation, while others have urged caution, calling for all sides to be heard.
Nigeria’s constitution guarantees freedom of religion and the right to education. Whether the allegations will lead to official action may depend on further evidence and the response of relevant authorities.
