The African Democratic Congress (ADC) Presidential Campaign Council (PCC) has demanded the immediate release of the Certified True Copy (CTC) of the Federal High Court judgment delivered in Abuja, which voided the nomination of former Vice President Atiku Abubakar as the opposition party’s presidential candidate for the 2027 polls.
In a statement issued by the Director of Strategic Communication, Phrank Shaibu, the campaign council stated that its legal counsel had formally applied for the certified copy of the ruling—which also sacked the Senator David Mark-led leadership—and paid the required fees, yet the document remains withheld.
The council argued that withholding the certified copy “prevents the affected parties from knowing the exact orders made and responding fully through the courts,” emphasizing that the party will not be intimidated.
“Our counsel applied for the certified copy and paid the required fee, yet the judgment remains out of reach. This is an indefensible denial of access to a ruling that directly affects the party and its members. If the judgment was ready, there is no excuse for keeping it from the parties. Release it now,” the statement read.
Giving details of the applications, the PCC noted: “Our counsel for the first defendant filed a formal application for the certified true copy on November 6, 2026, and paid the assessed fee. Counsel for the third defendant applied the day before, on the very day the judgment was delivered.
“Both applications carry the Federal High Court’s ‘PAID’ stamp. Every requirement was met. Yet, the applicants are still being denied the judgment.”
The council described the development as more than a routine administrative delay, terming it a deliberate denial of access to a court decision that directly impacts the rights of litigants.
“Justice Lifu declared the judgment ready; the applicants paid for its certified copy; the court has acknowledged payment. Why, then, are they still being kept in the dark? A judge cannot announce that a judgment is ready and leave litigants to chase the document they need to understand and challenge it,” the ADC queried.
The party maintained that the judgment—affecting the leadership of a major political party and the rights of its members—cannot be kept out of reach if it is legally sound.
“The Federal High Court must release the judgment immediately and explain why paid applications have gone unanswered. Public confidence cannot survive a process in which consequential judgments are announced, but their official records are denied to the parties,” it stated.
Furthermore, the campaign council questioned the timing of the judicial pronouncements. “The timing and conduct of this process are indefensible. Justice Lifu delivered the judgment days after the ADC launched its Sokoto campaign; he then declared the copies ready, yet the parties’ paid applications remain unanswered.
“The public is entitled to ask whether this was a judicial process—or a calculated attempt to deliver a political blow while denying the party the document needed to challenge it. Whoever believes that withholding the judgment will bury these questions or shield those responsible from scrutiny is gravely mistaken.”
Reiterating its stance, the ADC demanded a public explanation for the delay, warning that every day the document is withheld deepens the damage to public confidence in the judiciary.
“Those responsible must understand that the ADC will pursue every lawful remedy, place the full record before the appropriate authorities, and ensure that Nigerians know what has happened. No party, official, or judicial officer is beyond scrutiny when the rights of citizens and the integrity of the electoral process are at stake.
“The ADC will not be intimidated or denied its right to challenge this ruling. Any attempt to obstruct that right will be met with every lawful action available, and those responsible will be held to account through the proper legal and institutional channels. Justice must be done, its record must be accessible, and the consequences of denying the parties that access must not be evaded,” the council concluded.
