The Peoples Democratic Party’s internal crisis has reached a critical inflection point, with the party’s two most powerful figures now engaged in a bitter public dispute that threatens to define the opposition’s trajectory towards the 2027 general elections. Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Minister Nyesom Wike has dismissed allegations by Oyo State Governor Seyi Makinde as entirely false, characterising his former ally’s claims as driven by personal frustration and political ambition gone awry.
The controversy centres on allegations made by Makinde last week that Wike privately pledged to President Bola Tinubu that he would weaken the PDP ahead of the 2027 presidential race. In his response during a media chat on Monday, 29 December 2025, at his Port Harcourt residence, Wike flatly denied the claim, describing it as “completely out of place” and questioning both its veracity and the timing of Makinde’s decision to make such allegations public.
“First of all, you ask yourself, what was that meeting? What was the purpose of that meeting? That would have led me to say, Mr President, I will hold PDP for you,” Wike said during the interaction with journalists. He went further to query why Makinde failed to raise the issue earlier if such an exchange had genuinely occurred. “Why did Seyi Makinde not come up all this while to tell the party, ‘see what Wike is doing’? I was in a meeting. I saw what Wike said. It’s not correct.”
Wike’s account of events differs materially from Makinde’s version. Rather than a secret bilateral engagement with the president, Wike contends the visit involved multiple PDP leaders in an informal, post-election setting. “There was no such meeting. Rather, my humble self, the former governor of Benue State, Samuel Ortom, the former governor of Abia State, Okezie Ikpeazu, the former governor of Enugu State, Ifeanyi Ugwuanyi, and Seyi Makinde, went to see the president,” he clarified.
According to Wike’s account, the gathering occurred after the 2023 general elections concluded and was centred on discussing general political matters rather than a pre-arranged political transaction. He stressed that the president’s Chief of Staff was present throughout, as is standard protocol when meeting the chief executive. “We went to see the president after elections were over, to discuss certain things. While we were there, the Chief of Staff — you should know that the Chief of Staff is always around the president,” Wike explained.
Wike further stated that he personally invited the Chief of Staff to join the discussion to help reinforce points the group had raised with the president. “I was the one who said, ‘Look, Chief of Staff, come and sit down, so we can remind the president of what we have discussed. There was nothing like a meeting we booked to go and see Mr President.'”
The dispute, which once appeared rooted in policy differences, has now evolved into a pointed personal exchange. Wike attributed Makinde’s allegations to what he described as visible frustration, suggesting that the Oyo governor’s political ambitions, far from benefiting the PDP, have become the source of the party’s deepening instability.
“I have told everybody, frustration — if you can see it, if you watch Seyi Makinde, you can see frustration. And this young man, we have advised severely,” Wike said, his tone reflecting the bitterness that has characterised their recent interactions.
He was equally critical of Makinde’s approach to politics, drawing a sharp contrast between political engagement rooted in established norms and what he characterised as the transactional mindset of a business contractor. “Politics is not like being a contractor with Shell. Politics is not like being a contractor. It has different rules,” Wike remarked, adding that ambition pursued without regard for party rules and customs ultimately undermines rather than advances one’s political standing.
“When did Seyi Makinde come into politics? There is nothing wrong with having ambition, but the ambition must be pursued according to the rules,” Wike said. He pointedly noted that Makinde has never formally declared a presidential ambition, despite his actions suggesting such aspirations. “He has not even had the guts to tell us that he wants to run for president.”
The Wike-Makinde dispute, whilst the most visible manifestation of the PDP’s internal turbulence, reflects deeper fractures within the party that have been widening since Nigeria’s return to democracy in 1999. Political analyst Jide Ojo characterised the PDP’s predicament as rooted in what he termed “post-election loss traumatic disorder,” a condition stemming from the party’s series of electoral defeats dating back to 2015.
“The party’s long-standing problems have been worsened by the open fallout between Makinde and Wike, which he described as the immediate cause of the current crisis,” according to Ojo’s assessment provided to Channels Television. What began as a clash of interests over party direction has now become a public spectacle that reveals the extent of the opposition’s organisational dysfunction.
The two governors were once aligned, having jointly led the ‘G5’ group of governors who defected from the PDP to support Tinubu’s 2023 presidential bid after disagreements over the party’s leadership and zoning arrangements. However, their relationship has deteriorated sharply, with the PDP itself suspending Wike and other prominent figures over allegations of anti-party activities—charges they have denied.
Wike accused Makinde of orchestrating the removal of the party’s National Secretary, Samuel Anyanwu, in a bid to consolidate control over the party structure. He also blamed Makinde for initiating the crisis by arranging to remove Anyanwu and thereafter attempting to reconstitute the party’s leadership through an unconstitutional convention.
Read Also: ‘No PDP, No APC in Rivers’: Wike Reasserts Influence, Plans Weekly Visits
“How did PDP enter this crisis? It is Seyi Makinde’s ambition,” Wike stated, alleging that Makinde coordinated with others to oust the secretary and subsequently convened a contentious convention in Ibadan in November 2025. That convention produced a rival set of national officers, with one faction backing a leadership aligned with Makinde and another supporting the faction Wike backs.
The disputed convention has become a legal battleground. Wike pointed to two substantive judgments from the Federal High Court—issued by Justices James Omotosho and Peter Lifu—that prohibited the convention from proceeding. However, according to Wike’s account, Makinde obtained an ex parte order from an Ibadan State High Court that purportedly overrode those earlier rulings, allowing the convention to proceed without the Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) presence or recognition.
“How could an ex parte order override the substantive judgment of two courts? Of course, he went ahead with his so-called convention. INEC was not there. INEC refused to recognise them,” Wike said. INEC subsequently challenged the matter in court, and that challenge was struck out, according to Wike’s version of events.
Despite earlier court judgments, Makinde sought court recognition of the disputed convention, a move Wike described as defiant and destabilising. “The convention that the Federal High Court has said you cannot go ahead with. After disobeying the court judgment, you now filed at the Federal High Court in Ibadan to recognise you as the legitimate principal officers,” Wike added.
The implications of the PDP’s internal collapse extend well beyond the party itself. With the 2027 general elections just over a year away, the opposition’s ability to mount a credible challenge to President Tinubu’s administration or to govern effectively should it return to power remains seriously compromised.
Wike himself sounded a warning about the party’s political future. “We have a leadership that is not focused, we have a leadership that does not know what to do or take any suggestions,” he said, urging the party hierarchy to take corrective action. “If the leadership is committed and comes back to say we have made a mistake, why is it that things are happening this way, and what do we do to make corrections?”
In a stark assessment of the PDP’s current standing, Wike suggested that the party’s internal divisions have left it vulnerable to continued political marginalisation. “If council elections were held in the FCT today, the PDP would struggle to win,” he acknowledged, noting that ongoing development projects in Abuja would likely favour President Tinubu in such a contest.
The crisis within the PDP serves as a reminder that Nigeria’s multiparty democracy, whilst resilient in structural terms, remains fragile in organisational terms. The inability of the opposition’s leading figures to manage their differences or even to agree on the facts surrounding meetings and statements raises questions about the party’s readiness to govern at a moment when Nigeria faces mounting security, economic, and social challenges.
